Re: users & groups
От | R D |
---|---|
Тема | Re: users & groups |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000619132844.545.qmail@web204.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | users & groups (R D <mrk279@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
--- Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, R D wrote: > > > Hi,I need a secondary passwd files because I do > not > > know another way to manage user access to DBs. > > That's what I thought. > > > If there was a pg_shadow in every DB replacing > external passwd file, > > Hmm, that would be in semi-violation of SQL, since > users are supposed to > be global. We've been thinking about making > per-database *passwords* for > each user, but I don't think this buys a lot. > > > Or maybe it would be better and more reasonable to > use a table in > > every database with the list of users who can > access the database and > > their privileges on it. > > That could be a problem. Assume you delete all users > from that table. How > do you get back in and add any? But something like > this is clearly needed, > it just can't be in the database -- probably > pg_hba.conf. > Ok, But why it should be outside the DBs?!? I think that all user information should be stored comletely inside or completely outside. Any other way of doing this is not reasnonable(put politely). All this information could be stored in some system table like users ;). It's stupid to create user two times, once in database, once in pg_hba.conf or whereever else. What do you think? Am I right? Rumen p.s. Btw what will happen if U delete all users from pg_user? :) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: