Re: Big 7.1 open items
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200006160224.WAA04345@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Big 7.1 open items (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
RE: Big 7.1 open items
Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > > Now I like neither relname nor oid because it's not sufficient > > for my purpose. > > We should probably not do much of anything with this issue until > we have a clearer understanding of what we want to do about > tablespaces and schemas. Here is an analysis of our options: Work required Disadvantages ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keep current system no work rename/create no rollback relname/oid but less work new pg_class column, no rename change filename not accurate on rename relname/oid with more work complex code rename change during vacuum oid filename less work, but confusing to admins need admin tools -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: