Re: Odd release numbers for development versions?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Odd release numbers for development versions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200006061607.MAA27510@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Odd release numbers for development versions? ("Robert B. Easter" <reaster@comptechnews.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Is PostgreSQL going to start using odd release numbers for development > versions? This is how the Linux kernel is, and some other projects. > > Version.release.revision/build > > Like 7.0.x would be the current stable branch. 7.1.x, the current development > branch. The next stable branch would be 7.2.x. Within the current even > release stable branch, maybe only do bug fixes. In the odd dev releases, focus > on new/experiemental. Both branches could have very frequent *.x > revisions/builds. I guess you'd have to apply patches to both branches > sometimes, like when a bug is found in 7.0.x, it is patched and the same patch > applied to the 7.1.x if needed. > > This way there would be a clear distinction for users what is likely to be good > for production use and what is still unproven. No even/odd mess. Every release is stable. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: