Re: AW: New warning code for missing FROM relations

> Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> > I take it that there is no chance of a compile-time or runtime option to
> > disallow this kind of thing in all cases?
> 
> Define "all cases" ... also, just how strict do you want to be?
> Disallow use of *any* Postgres feature that is not in SQL92 (that
> would include all user datatypes and functions, for example)?
> 
> Postgres was never designed as an SQL compatibility checker, and
> I doubt that it'd be cost-effective to try to turn it into one.
> A standalone tool might be a better approach.
> 
> Perhaps there is someone out there who wants this feature badly
> enough to do the legwork, but I'm not him ;-)

Agreed.  Seems the current warning level as configured is in the middle
of people's expections on this issue.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026