Re: Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200006011757.NAA18771@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO list. > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> What though if a function accesses a table? Which one goes first? Do we > >> have to maintain a network of dependencies in pg_dump? Eventually we'll > >> probably have to, with all the foreign key stuff coming up. Gloomy > >> prospects. > > Couldn't we solve this by the simple expedient of dumping all the > objects in the database in OID order? > > Expecting pg_dump to parse function bodies to discover what > relations/types are mentioned doesn't look appetizing at all... > > regards, tom lane > > ************ > -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: