Re: MySQL now supports transactions ...
От | Michael A. Olson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL now supports transactions ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200005240027.RAA06062@triplerock.olsons.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL now supports transactions ... (Ned Lilly <ned@greatbridge.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 08:02 PM 5/23/00 -0400, you wrote: > Apparently by way of some Berkeley DB code.... > > http://web.mysql.com/php/manual.php3?section=BDB Yeah, that's correct. As there was no existing transaction layer in place, it was pretty straightforward to add Berkeley DB. They had to abstract the ISAM layer that they've used to date, but there were no serious technical issues. You can choose which kind of tables you want (myisam or bdb) at table creation time. BDB tables have the standard ACID properties that Berkeley DB provides generally, via the standard mechanisms (two-phase locking, write-ahead logging, and so forth). The 3.23.16 release is decidedly alpha, but is in good enough shape to distribute. My bet is that we'll hammer out a few dumb bugs in the next weeks, and they'll cut something more stable soon. You need to download the 3.1.5 distribution of Berkeley DB from MySQL.com. We're not distributing that version from Sleepycat. We're in the middle of the release cycle for our 3.1 release, and expect to cut a stable one in the next week or so. MySQL relies on a couple of features we added to 3.1 for them, so they can't run with the 3.0 release that's up on our site now. It's been pretty quiet since my message on Sunday, about the difficulties in integrating Berkeley DB with the PostgreSQL backend. Vadim (and others), what is your opinion? My impression is that the project is too much trouble, but I'd be glad to hear from you folks on the topic. mike
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: