Re: Berkeley DB license
От | Michael A. Olson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Berkeley DB license |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200005161446.HAA76256@triplerock.olsons.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Berkeley DB license (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Berkeley DB license
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 12:28 AM 5/17/00 +1000, you wrote: > Just to clarify - if I take PostgreSQL, make a few minor changes to create > a commercial product called Boastgress, your proposed license would allow > the distribution of binaries for the new product without further > interaction, payments, or licensing from Sleepycat? Correct. > Similaryly, if changes were made to BDB, I would not have to send those > changes to you, nor would I have to make the source available? Also correct. However, the license would only permit redistribution of the Berkeley DB software embedded in the PostgreSQL engine or the derivative product that the proprietary vendor distributes. The vendor would not be permitted to extract Berkeley DB from PostgreSQL and distribute it separately, as part of some other product offering or as a standalone embedded database engine. The intent here is to clear the way for use of Berkeley DB in PostgreSQL, but not to apply PostgreSQL's license to Berkeley DB for other uses. mike
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: