Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> >> I griped about that a week or so ago, but no one seems to have picked up
> >> on it.  Do you want to consider that a "must fix" problem as well?
> >> I think it's a pretty minor fix, but considering how late we are in the
> >> cycle...
> 
> > considering where the problem is, I think that if it can be safely done,
> > please do it ...
> 
> Done and done.  I also realized that pg_upgrade had another nasty bug
> in it: the VACUUMs were not necessarily executed as superuser, but as
> whichever user happened to own the item dumped last by pg_dump in each
> database.  That would result in VACUUM skipping over tables it thought
> it didn't have permission to vacuum --- like, say, all the system
> tables.  Perhaps this explains the failures that some people have
> reported.
> 
> Another day, another bug swatted ...

Yes, good eye.  Thanks.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026