Re: Index tuple count != heap tuple count problem identified]
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index tuple count != heap tuple count problem identified] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200004060124.VAA22612@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Index tuple count != heap tuple count problem identified ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
RE: Index tuple count != heap tuple count problem identified]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org]On > > Behalf Of Tom Lane > > > > You'll probably recall reports of messages like this out of VACUUM: > > NOTICE: Index ind1: NUMBER OF INDEX' TUPLES (2002) IS NOT THE > > SAME AS HEAP' (3003). > > I've figured out the cause (or at least a cause) of this condition. > > > > The CREATE INDEX operation has only bothered to index the non-dead > > tuples. So, VACUUM's little sanity check fails. > > > Is it wrong to change the implementation of CREATE INDEX ? > I have a fix. > It needs the change of duplicate check(tuplesort->btbuild) and > I've thougth that it would be better to change it after the release > of 7.0. Well, it seems we better do something about it before 7.0 is released. Now it seems we have to decide to change CREATE INDEX, or modify VACUUM. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: