Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql

On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 02:29:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Hmm.  Since there have been examples of vacuum analyze <tablename> in
> the numeric regress test since 6.5, I'd think we'd have heard about it
> if there were any widespread problem ;-).  Perhaps it is a platform
> issue, but I suspect you will find there are additional constraints that
> explain why no one but you is seeing it.  Please do dig into it ... or,
> if you do not have time, you could consider giving one of the other
> developers a login on your machine and that person could check it out.

Story so far: I have a table called "found". vacuum() in src/backend/commands/vacuum.c
gets called with vacrel="found". During vc_init() at line 177, vacrel is cleared (="").

More tomorrow...

Cheers,

Patrick