Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types

> > Possibly I misunderstand the rules we set for beta phase, but my
> > understanding was not so much "no initdbs" as "no new-feature
> > development".  This sure looks like it needs some more feature
> > development...
> 
> That's how I understood it, as well. It's just that Bruce had (at one
> time) offered to do the intergration/development of this type, and one
> interpretation of what he posted was that he had the code, but hadn't
> integrated it, because of the "no initdb" rule. Since Bruce tends to be
> the man for submissions from non-core developers, I just wanted to make
> sure everyone was on the same page.

No, I have not written the code.  I have been pretty busy and did not go
though my mailbox like I normally do before beta time.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026