Re: bit types
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bit types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200003011636.LAA08033@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce, > > The bit-type that is in contrib is useless as it stands. Those are > only C-routines to implement the functionality, and there are none of > the SQL functions to actually make these usable. This really needs to be > integrated with postgres proper. I don't know how to go about this and > that is why I asked for help. I'm prepared to do whatever SQL function > definitions are needed, do the regression tests etc. Would it be better > to go back to the hackers mailing list to ask for help? Has this missed > 7.0 now? If so, we'd better remove the bit-type from contrib. I clearly dropped the ball on this one. Don't think it can go into 7.0 because it would require catalog changes/initdb. However, I would like to keep it in contrib and add it as soon as 7.0 finalizes and we move to 7.1. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: