Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200002161639.LAA02621@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Actually, the point of including c.h (plus postgres_ext.h) rather than > postgres.h was to not have access to the backend internal stuff, so as to > keep the separation clean. But it doesn't really matter to me. Also, on my > system at least, there were no redundant includes. I actually went through > each library call and put in exactly the includes the man page mentioned. Yes, I suspected that was your purpose. I couldn't find any other areas where c.h was used, so I figured I may as well make it standard, and if we want to make it separate, we would have to do most of bin and interfaces, and that would be a separate job. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: