Re: [HACKERS] TODO item
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] TODO item |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200002091617.LAA22751@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] TODO item (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Thinking about a little bit more, I have come across yet another > possible solution. It is actually *very* simple. Details as follows. > > In xact.c:RecordTransactionCommit() there are two FlushBufferPool > calls. One is for relation files and the other is for pg_log. I add > sync() right after these FlushBufferPool. It will force any pending > kernel buffers physically be written onto disk, thus should guarantee > the ACID of the transaction (see attached code fragment). Interesting idea. I had proposed this solution long ago. My idea was to buffer pg_log writes every 30 seconds. Every 30 seconds, do a sync, then write/sync pg_log. Seemed like a good solution at the time, but Vadim didn't like it. I think he prefered to do logging, but honestly, it was over a year ago, and we could have been benefiting from it all this time. Second, I had another idea. What if we fsync()'ed a file descriptor only when we were writing the _last_ dirty buffer for that file. Seems in many cases this would be a win. I just don't know how hard that is to figure out. Seems there is no need to fsync() if we still have dirty buffers around. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: