Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem
От | Patrick Welche |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000205143515.F3402@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 03:58:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Any thoughts on where to look? > > Is there anything in the postmaster log? DEBUG: Data Base System is in production state at Fri Feb 4 17:11:05 2000 Server process (pid 3588) exited with status 11 at Fri Feb 4 17:14:57 2000 Terminating any active server processes... Server processes were terminated at Fri Feb 4 17:14:57 2000 Reinitializing shared memory and semaphores > Is there a core file (look > in the database subdirectory, ie .../data/base/yourdatabase/core)? But no core file ... so who knows what the sigsegv comes from. (don't worry coredumpsize unlimited) > If so, compiling the backend with -g and extracting a backtrace from > the resulting corefile with gdb would be very useful info. (already have the -g..) Still looking... Cheers, Patrick
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: