Re: [HACKERS] Copyright
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Copyright |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200001281837.NAA00971@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Copyright (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Copyright
Re: [HACKERS] Copyright |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > This came down with my latest update and confused me quite a bit: > > * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2000, PostgreSQL, Inc > > Since when do *they* own the copyright? Whatever happened to the good old > PostgreSQL Global Development Group? Assigning the copyright of an open > source project to a commercial entity is something unprecedented, and > quite frankly (without having anything at all against PostgreSQL, Inc) I > am not so excited about it. That is what I was told by Marc. If we want to discuss it, go ahead. Such a change was planned in late December, though there was no discussion who gets the copyright. I believe he used PostgreSQL Inc. because it is a legal entity, vs. the development team, which is not. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: