Re: [GENERAL] How to handle non-postgres questions?
От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] How to handle non-postgres questions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000128135954.A12248@rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | How to handle non-postgres questions? (davidb@vectormath.com) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 01:41:52PM -0600, davidb@vectormath.com wrote: > Occasionally a question is posted to this list that is not a question > about postgres, but to which I know the answer. When this happens, I > usually reply only to the person who posted the question, rather than to > the whole list. I do this to minimize non-postgres traffic on the list. > However, this has the disadvantage of making it seem that questions > that are posted to the list are ignored. Is responding only to the > sender the correct thing to do, or should I include the whole list? > I'd say, if it's a sort answer (like this one ;-), post it as well. If it's long and detailed, go ahead and send email, but if you want, post a brief reply to the list, usually just quoting the question, and saying "Answered in private email" Ross P.S. Watch your line lengths! -- Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer Computer and Information Technology Institute Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: