Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200001192012.PAA20286@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > On 2000-01-18, Bruce Momjian mentioned: > > > Can you run our keywords.c using our method and gperf and see if there > > is any speed difference? > > It seems to have a speed advantage of about 2.5. But in practice that > means that 1 million words take half a second. It's not a big deal to me, > I was just wondering before I throw it out. I guess it really only makes a > difference for compilers, which operate on 1000+ lines. > The big difference may be that the compiler has variables/types that are added dynamically while running, while our list is static. Insert time for our types is zero because we don't add SQL keywords at runtime. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: