Re: [HACKERS] flex
От | Patrick Welche |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] flex |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000117104959.D21506@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] flex (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 09:13:03PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > This puzzles me a bit still, but it seems to work. GNU suggests putting > yacc and lex files in distributions, so I can't imagine why they would do > that if you need to have lib[f]l.a anyway. > > $ nm /usr/lib/libfl.a > > libmain.o: > 00000000 t gcc2_compiled. > 00000000 T main > U yylex > > libyywrap.o: > 00000000 t gcc2_compiled. > 00000000 T yywrap I think those are defaults for the case where you just have a lex file, but didn't bother with defining a main() after the last %% eg: %% A putchar('b'); %% When linked with -lfl, you get an executable. In the postgresql case, life is more complicated and the parser calls yylex rather than a fake main(), so -lfl isn't needed. Cheers, Patrick
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: