Re: [HACKERS] PgQ and pg_dump

El 16/06/16 a las 09:48, Michael Paquier escribió:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Martín Marqués <martin@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>> This problem came up due to a difference between pg_dump on 9.1.12 and
>> 9.1.22 (I believe it was due to a patch on pg_dump that excluded the
>> dependent objects from being dumped), but here I'm using 9.5.3:
>
> Hm. I don't recall anything in pg_dump lately except ebd092b, but that
> fixed another class of problems.

I believe it was this one:

commit 5108013dbbfedb5e5af6a58cde5f074d895c46bf
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date:   Wed Jan 13 18:55:27 2016 -0500

    Handle extension members when first setting object dump flags in
pg_dump.

Regards,

--
Martín Marqués                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services