Re: Correct docs about partitions and EXCLUDE constraints

On 6/19/25 08:43, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Leaving it in the entry for PARTITION BY seems out of place; shouldn't
> it be moved to the entry for EXCLUDE? I also merged your wording with
> some similar wording from the entry about UNIQUE. Attached.

I agree this new location makes more sense. The wording looks good.

Thanks!

-- 
Paul              ~{:-)
pj@illuminatedcomputing.com