Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
От | snacktime |
---|---|
Тема | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1f060c4c0610112036i674b8ae1t118501fde9c3f9aa@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD (alexei.vladishev@gmail.com) |
Ответы |
Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> 1. create table test (id int4, aaa int4, primary key (id)); > 2. insert into test values (0,1); > 3. Execute "update test set aaa=1 where id=0;" in an endless loop > > I just did the test on PostgreSQL 7.4.12 and MySQL 5.0.22 (MyISAM, > sorry had no configured InnoDB). Ubuntu 6.0.6, AMD64, 2GB, default > database settings. > > MySQL performs very well, approximately 15000-20000 updates per second > with no degradation of performance. > > PostgreSQL does approximately 1600 records per second for the first > 10000, then 200rps for the first 100k records, and then slower and > slower downgrading to 10-20 rps(!!!) when reaching 300k. Something is wrong with your test code. If I had to guess I would say you did all the updates in a single transaction without committing them, in which case yes it will slow down until you commit.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: