Re: [GENERAL] Question regarding logical replication
От | Weiping Qu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Question regarding logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1ef3248f-17f1-4b8d-94a0-72a3b712b03e@informatik.uni-kl.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Question regarding logical replication (Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Question regarding logical replication
|
Список | pgsql-general |
That's a good point and we haven't accounted for disk caching. Is there any way to confirm this fact in PostgreSQL? Weiping On 27.10.2017 11:53, Francisco Olarte wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Weiping Qu <qu@informatik.uni-kl.de> wrote: > >> However, the plots showed different trend (currently I don't have plots on >> my laptop) which shows that the more frequently are the CDC processes >> reading from logical slots, the less overhead is incurred over PostgreSQL, >> which leads to higher throughput. > Have you accounted for disk caching? Your CDC may be getting log from > the cache when going with little lag but being forced to read from > disk (make the server do it ) when it falls behind. > > Francisco Olarte. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: