Re: [GENERAL] pg_catalog tables don't have constraints?
От | Neil Anderson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] pg_catalog tables don't have constraints? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1e0dcf0e-7539-2eee-b4c6-95274637b81a@postgrescompare.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] pg_catalog tables don't have constraints? ("" <kbrannen@pwhome.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> That's a great start, thanks! You should put a pointer to that page in the Pg wiki. > > I think the 1 thing that would really help it though is to show the actual > connection/relations of the columns. For example, a line between pg_index > and pg_class is not quite as informative as a line from pg_index.indexrelid > to pg_class.oid (something the PNG file in the image that Thomas pointed > out does). I suspect that's a limitation of the tool not your desire. I think that might be possible, I may have turned off the labels on the edges. > > Is this process automated, or does it require you to lay it out? > The layouts were all built in the DataGrip luckily! > In my perfect world, :) there would be a way to generate it automatically with > Graphviz or something similar. Hmm, perhaps an idea to pursue when I can find > some time. > > Kevin > > I think SchemaSpy's new output looks really interesting and uses Graphviz. After doing the work to add the relationships I realised that SchemaSpy does not like the oid system columns that we use for keys so it wouldn't work. I will go ahead and replace them all with something else and see how it does but I haven't gotten back to it yet. -- Neil Anderson neil@postgrescompare.com http://www.postgrescompare.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: