Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
От | Ian Barwick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1d581afe041105104247e2db8e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:22:55 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > Am Freitag, 5. November 2004 14:13 schrieb Andrew Dunstan: > > I'll repeat an observation I made (more or less) last time we had this > > discussion: the loudest voice in it belongs to those who actually use > > the repository most. When Tom or Bruce or Peter (for example) tell us we > > need to change I'll take lots more notice. > > I'm certainly open to considering subversion, although I have a certain > traumatic experience with it that may or may not be related to the BDB > backend that it uses. Aha, glad I'm not the only one. Version 1.1 has a flat-file based backend which is not prone to BDB-permission-related problems, see: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook-1.1/ch05.html#svn-ch-5-sect-1.4 . It's only been around a few months though and the docs mention possible issues with scalability. Ian Barwick barwick@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: