Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
От | Guillaume Smet |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1d4e0c10903260032v767da1fdg6cf7cea86c64cc45@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > What does "the default" mean? You mean that new trigger should use > the existing trigger option character (-t)? Yes, that's my point. I understand it seems weird to switch the options but I'm pretty sure a lot of persons currently using -t would be surprised by the current behaviour. Moreover playing all the remaining WALs before starting up should be the most natural option when people are looking in the help. That said, it would be nice to hear from people really using pg_standby to know if they understand how it works now and if it's what they intended when they set it up. -- Guillaume
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: