Re: maintenance memory vs autovac

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> The autovacuum workers change that and make it a default behaviour (as
>> we can have 3*maintenance_work_mem by default).
>
> It's still one per process, it's just that autovac uses more than one
> process.

I agree. What I implied is that by default you have 3 autovacuum
workers so the behaviour has changed, even if it didn't change in a
technical way.

> It's probably worthwhile to add a note about the effects of
> autovacuum around the documentation of maintenance_work_mem, though.

+1
A lot of people set maintenance_work_mem quite high because of the old
behaviour.

-- 
Guillaume