Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
От | Guillaume Smet |
---|---|
Тема | Re: log_duration is redundant, no? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1d4e0c10609071550x5701b926te018649d77bf399f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: log_duration is redundant, no? (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/8/06, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > If you are using an external tool, can't you just restrict what you > display based on the logged duration? It's not a matter of having too much information in our reports (the more information I have, the happier I am :)). It's a matter of slowing down too much the server with too much I/O. We can afford to log every duration and queries slower than 500ms nearly without any overhead. We can't afford to log every query, it generates too much I/O - note that we tried to do it and it was really too slow. With the former configuration we log 1.2 GB/day, with the latter I suspect it will be far more than 60 GB/day (I don't have the exact number as we can't do it for real but queries slower than 500 ms represents 1/100 of the total amount of queries). Query logging is really a nice way to monitor the activity of a PostgreSQL server and the overhead is not that high if logging I/O are not too intensive. -- Guillaume
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: