Re: PostgreSQL downloads compressed with bzip2 instead of
От | greg@turnstep.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL downloads compressed with bzip2 instead of |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1d150e981ebab6162f5cd86a1e87034f@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL downloads compressed with bzip2 instead of ("Daniel R. Anderson" <dan@mathjunkies.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL downloads compressed with bzip2 instead of
|
Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Moral of the Story: > > A smaller file to download (via better compression) only decreases the > time it takes to download. I think the real argument in favor of providing a bz2 alternative to gz *is* the time to download. Loading a Postgres tarball over a dialup line is much faster with bz2 rather than gz. This has been covered on the list before: I recall that most everyone agreed it was a good idea, but nobody on the website appeared ready to follow through with it and actually set up the bz2 files. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200303201036 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html iD8DBQE+eeCfvJuQZxSWSsgRAvy+AJ9wWoOgXezn3p01/D4jed2sNqT6DQCfXkz5 0uvv7khQJ4LAXMYydMnpWdM= =Lg8Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: