Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded
От | Wolfgang Walther |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1d11d75a-89cf-4e75-9c39-76bef37fc029@technowledgy.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded
Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian: > I guess we could conditionally exec only if we find we must, but then > such exec cases would be rare and rarely tested. I think you might be seriously underestimating how often musl is used. Alpine Linux uses musl and is very widespread in the container world because of smaller image size. The library/postgres docker image has been pulled about 8 billion times since 2014 [1]. While we can't really tell how many of those pulled the alpine variant of the image, comparing the alpine [2] and ubuntu/debian [3,4] base images gives a rough estimate of >50% using alpine in general. This is certainly not rare. But yeah, buildfarm coverage for musl would be good, I agree. Maybe even directly in CI? Best, Wolfgang [1]: https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/library/postgres [2]: https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/library/alpine [3]: https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/library/ubuntu [4]: https://hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/library/debian
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: