Re: More new SQL/JSON item methods
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: More new SQL/JSON item methods |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1d092c02-8249-4e56-8b8e-ae4db95b8fde@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: More new SQL/JSON item methods (Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: More new SQL/JSON item methods
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17.01.24 10:03, Jeevan Chalke wrote: > I added unary '+' and '-' support as well and thus thought of having > separate rules altogether rather than folding those in. > > Per SQL standard, the precision and scale arguments are unsigned > integers, so unary plus and minus signs are not supported. So my patch > removes that support, but I didn't adjust the regression tests for that. > > > However, PostgreSQL numeric casting does support a negative scale. Here > is an example: > > # select '12345'::numeric(4,-2); > numeric > --------- > 12300 > (1 row) > > And thus thought of supporting those. > Do we want this JSON item method to behave differently here? Ok, it would make sense to support this in SQL/JSON as well. > I will merge them all into one and will try to keep them in the order > specified in sql_features.txt. > However, for documentation, it makes more sense to keep them in logical > order than the alphabetical one. What are your views on this? The documentation can be in a different order.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: