Re: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1c659890-cbf7-8c6d-266c-7521ab674bbf@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound (Perumal Raj <perucinci@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum Transaction Wraparound
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 3/11/19 11:51 AM, Perumal Raj wrote: > Hi Experts > > I have noticed in my Database that, there is no regular Vacuum > maintenance happening What Postgres version? > So i started Weekly Job across cluster. But still i am seeing gradual > growth on transacation ID. What query are you using? > > DB is still using default autovacuum_freeze_min_age & > autovacuum_freeze_table_age. What are the actual settings for?: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/runtime-config-autovacuum.html > > Question : Since i am running regularly vacuum job ( weekly) and the > Transaction age is gradually growing , What is next once i hit 200M > limit ( default ). > Should i increase my default value ? If so any calculation for increase > the value based on my DB transaction growth. > > Thanks, > Raj -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: