Re: [PERFORM] More cores or higer frequency ?
От | Sven R. Kunze |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORM] More cores or higer frequency ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1c5c89f2-9b3a-69f2-af2a-c905affc1944@mail.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORM] More cores or higer frequency ? (Jarek <jarek@poczta.srv.pl>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORM] More cores or higer frequency ?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 23.05.2017 22:14, Jarek wrote: > I have pool of clients (~30) inserting to database about 50 records per > second (in total from all clients) and small numer (<10) clients > querying database for those records once per 10s. > Other queries are rare and irregular. > The biggest table has ~ 100mln records (older records are purged > nightly). Database size is ~13GB. > I near future I'm expecting ~150 clients and 250 inserts per second and > more clients querying database. > Server is handling also apache with simple web application written in > python. > For the same price, I can get 8C/3.2GHz or 14C/2.6GHz. Which one will be > better ? > > > Hi Jarek, in case of your increasing parallel requirements (more clients, more inserts), I would tend to the 14C setup. However, as usual take this with a grain of salt. My word is not a guarantee for success in this case. Best would be to setup a test scenario where you can simulate with both hardware setups. Regards, Sven
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: