Re: Default permissisons from schemas
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Default permissisons from schemas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1FF2D97D-7CED-41E7-8996-CEA2CD4DDA95@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Default permissisons from schemas (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Default permissisons from schemas
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 23, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: >> Whoa. You are going to allow people to create objects owned by >> someone >> else? I don't think so ... most Unix systems have forbidden object >> give-away for years, for very good reasons. > > Hmm. While I agree with the sentiment, Unix does provide for setgid > such that objects inherit a specific group on creation. Using > roles we > don't get that distinction so I don't think comparing it to Unix is a > slam-dunk. There do need to be limitations here though, certainly. A > couple options, in order of my preference: Is there a use-case for per-schema default ownership? I can't really think of one... -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: