Re: best config
От | Steven Schlansker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: best config |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1E00F7E2-D6A3-4CB6-AE62-C109F35B45A3@likeness.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | best config (Roberto Scattini <roberto.scattini@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: best config
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Feb 6, 2013, at 8:14 AM, Roberto Scattini = <roberto.scattini@gmail.com> wrote: > hi list, >=20 > we have two new dell poweredge r720. based on recommendations from = this list we have configued the five disks in raid10 + 1 hot spare. You might mention a bit more about how your drives are configured. 5 = drives in a RAID1+0 sounds odd to me. >=20 > now we are looking for advice in the postgres installation for our = setup. >=20 > we have two databases. one for a lot of small apps and one for one big = app with a lot of data and a lot of usage. > we want to use streaming replication to have a functional copy of = databases in a failure. >=20 > one of the ideas is to have one database running on each server, and = then have another instance of the other database running in streaming = replication (i mean, crossed replications). >=20 > the other idea is to have both databases running in one server and = backup everything in the other with streaming replication. >=20 > which alternative would you use? I would not introduce the complexity of having each server be master for = half of the data unless you can show that this improves some metric you = care a lot about. Any failure or maintenance event will revert you back = to the common configuration -- back to having both masters on one system = -- until you do another promotion back to the "cross wired" setup. = Extra work without a proposed gain. Plus then you can get away with half as many Postgres installs to = maintain.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: