Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset
От | Greg Burd |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1D456624-470D-43C9-B59D-F487C35E0988@greg.burd.me обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 1 2025, at 1:14 am, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 06:00:59PM +1300, David Rowley wrote: >> I didn't look at the coverage report, but on thinking about it, >> test_bitmapset.c's "PG_RETURN_NULL(); /* invalid input */" won't be >> covered as I stripped out all the tests which purposefully pass >> invalid input. You may not want it that way if you're keen to keep the >> coverage of the test module high as well as bitmapset.c > > Yes, that's something I was just going through, with a result pretty > close to what you have sent, including the removal and replacement of > most of tests that were specific to the test module. The prev/next > member coverage is still looking OK from here, though. > > Thanks for the typos, I've missed these. > -- > Michael Michael, David, Thank you. :) The coverage[1] looks to be 100% for everything in bitmapset.c now and 98.6% of the test code[2] for Bitmapset -- more than enough and much better than before. I do like the cleanup/simplification that you two jointly applied. I think it's easier to maintain and reason about and looking at the final result I can see the logic in the simplified approach. I've learned a lot from this exercise not only about Bitmapset and various other areas in the code but also the approach/model for a task like this. I'll keep that in mind going forward. best. -greg [1] https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/nodes/bitmapset.c.gcov.html [2] https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/test/modules/test_bitmapset/test_bitmapset.c.gcov.html
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: