Re: Native partitioning tablespace inheritance
От | Christophe Pettus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Native partitioning tablespace inheritance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1D1180E1-BFB9-49E5-B68A-777241370375@thebuild.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Native partitioning tablespace inheritance (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Native partitioning tablespace inheritance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 09:17, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm, that's interesting. So you want the children to inherit the > parent's tablespace when they are created, but if the parent's > tablespace is later changed, the existing children don't move? +1 to that behavior. While it's always possible to just say "do the right thing" to the application when creating new children (that is, expectthat they will always specify a tablespace if it's not the default), this seems like the least-surprising behavior. It's true that an unpartitioned table will always be created in the default tablespace unless otherwise specified, but childtables are sufficiently distinct from that case that I don't see it as a painful asymmetry. -- -- Christophe Pettus xof@thebuild.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: