RE: Patch for JDBC driver not returning correct # of re cords deleted
От | Peter Mount |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Patch for JDBC driver not returning correct # of re cords deleted |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B3A2@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Patch for JDBC driver not returning correct # of re cords
deleted
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
I've already got this one in ready to commit (it was way too late last night :) )... -- Peter Mount Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council Email: petermount@maidstone.gov.uk WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough Council -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:11 AM To: Barry Lind Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for JDBC driver not returning correct # of records deleted > I had a problem with the JDBC driver (in 7.0.2) always returning 1 as > the row count for deletes (whether the actual delete affected 0 or more > rows). In looking through the source this appears to be a simple one > line code fix. > > Change line 370 in src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/Connection.java > v1.1 from: > if(recv_status.startsWith("INSERT") || > recv_status.startsWith("UPDATE")) { > to: > if(recv_status.startsWith("INSERT") || > recv_status.startsWith("UPDATE") || recv_status.startsWith("DELETE")) { > > thanks, > --Barry > If I look at the code in the current CVS tree, I see a test only for INSERT, and not INSERT and UPDATE. Can you supply a context diff that I can apply? That would help me be sure I am changing the right lines. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: