RE: JDBC Patch
От | Peter Mount |
---|---|
Тема | RE: JDBC Patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B2D7@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | JDBC Patch (Christopher Cain <ccain@mhsoftware.com>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
The problem is that there are so many different places it can go. I was thinking of moving the version stuff into DriverClass.java (which is built dynamically by make), but I'm not sure how adding malefile.global would affect the compilation process. However, JDBC needs: Full string: "7.0.2" Major version: 7 Minor version: 0 and those are just from memory. If I get chance today, I'll look into it. Peter -- Peter Mount Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council Email: petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough Council -----Original Message----- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 9:28 AM To: Peter Mount Cc: 'Christopher Cain'; pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC Patch Peter Mount writes: > Hmmm, I thought I had caught all the version strings. Thanks for spotting > it. Peter, you can avoid this sort of thing in the future. Makefile.global defines a variable `VERSION' that you should compile into the binaries. I'm not sure exactly how it would work with Java, but perhaps something like this: javac -Dversion='"$(VERSION)"' xyz.java or run sed before the compilation. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: