RE: SQL99 functions
От | Peter Mount |
---|---|
Тема | RE: SQL99 functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1AF9A@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SQL99 functions (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Not knowing much on this side of things but in JDBC, CallableStatement mentions things like IN, OUT & INOUT args - not sure about INOUT, but IN & OUT are there. Perhaps OUT are not valid for selects, but are in stored procedures? Peter -- Peter Mount Enterprise Support Maidstone Borough Council Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 9:51 AM To: Thomas Lockhart Cc: Hackers List Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SQL99 functions Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > I see mention in SQL99 of function definitions which can have IN, OUT, > and INOUT arguments. Any thoughts on how this could be supported in > Postgres? I noticed that but haven't quite figured out how it's supposed to fit into the SQL worldview at all. SurelySELECT foo(x) FROM table shouldn't silently mutate into an UPDATE depending on how foo() is declared. Exactly where is a function with OUT args useful in SQL? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: