RE: [INTERFACES] Access 2000 and ODBC
От | Peter Mount |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [INTERFACES] Access 2000 and ODBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C163@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
I haven't used Access with the ODBC driver (only Crystal Reports), but I do remember this requirement. Peter -- Peter Mount Enterprise Support Maidstone Borough Council Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council. -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 4:48 PM To: Christopher R. Jones Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Access 2000 and ODBC > Interestingly enough, this thread is also very active on the MySQL mailing > list. It seems that ACCESS 2000 has a bug that makes many ODBC datasources > read only. Some MySQL tables linked to Access 2000 via ODBC are read/write > and some are not. Note that if the tables are converted to Foxpro tables > (use same column types) then Access has no problem. Hopefully Microsoft > will pay attention. I've worked just a bit with ODBC, but not with any of the front end tools you are discussing. But I vaguely recall some discussion on the list that some tool (Access?) required that there be a primary key defined to allow a table to be considered writable. Does this ring a bell with anyone? If not, sorry for the misdirection... - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California ************
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: