RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC & Netscape

Hmmm, I thought jar only appeared in 1.1. I'll have to double check the
docs.

Peter

-- 
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.



-----Original Message-----
From: Erkki Seppala [mailto:flux@inside.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 12:24 PM
To: Peter Mount
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC & Netscape


On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 12:13:16PM -0000, Peter Mount wrote:

> PM: Hmmm, .jar files shouldn't be compressed. They are basically
> uncompressed zip files (-0) and the spec states that they must never
be
> compressed. Perhaps its a quirk of either the jar tool the debian
> maintainer used, or the browser just simply handles compressed jar
> files.

Well, this is what jdk-1.1 jar does:

[14:18] lectric(pts/8):~% dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1M count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
[14:18] lectric(pts/8):~% jar cvf foo.jar foo
adding: foo (in=1048576) (out=1033) (deflated 99%)
[14:18] lectric(pts/8):~% ls -l foo.jar
-rw-rw-r--    1 flux     flux         1417 Jan  6 14:18 foo.jar

And that's the official jdk by Sun. Perhaps things have changed between
1.0
and 1.1? Netscape 4.7 handles it ok. I suspect that the original package
made for Debian might be created without compression, but still du -b of
the
contents after extracting the original postgresql.jar is more than the
size
of the original .jar.. (160768 bytes compared to 143506 bytes)
--  _____________________________________________________________________    / __// /__ ____  __
     Erkki Seppälä\   \   / /_ / // // /\ \/ /                       Inside Informatics ry\  /  /_/  /_/ \___/
/_/\_\@inside.org       http://www.inside.org/~flux/