RE: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?
От | Peter Mount |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C25E729@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom wrote: [snip] > I've noticed that Jan and a couple of other people have put copyright > notices in their own names on files that they've created from scratch, > but I feel uncomfortable with that practice. The Ghostscript/readline > fiasco illustrates the potential problems you can get into with > divergent copyrights on chunks of code that need to be distributed > together. My personal feeling is that if you're a member of the team, > stick the team copyright on it; don't open a can of legal worms. I agree with you. I'm not sure if there are anything like this in the jdbc or contrib/lo stuff saying my copyright, but if there is, feel free to change it to the team's copyright - I tend to run in autopilot when it comes to adding copyrights. Saying that, I'm doubtful that all of the JDBC source has a copyright notice of any kind in there. I'll trawl my copy of the source to see if this is the case. Peter -- Peter Mount Enterprise Support Maidstone Borough Council Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: