Re: FW: pgAgent job limit
От | Roberts, Jon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FW: pgAgent job limit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1A6E6D554222284AB25ABE3229A92762715785@nrtexcus702.int.asurion.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FW: pgAgent job limit ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: FW: pgAgent job limit
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
I was thinking about this part of the pgagent.sql script the other day: INSERT INTO pgagent.pga_jobclass (jclname) VALUES ('Routine Maintenance'); INSERT INTO pgagent.pga_jobclass (jclname) VALUES ('Data Import'); INSERT INTO pgagent.pga_jobclass (jclname) VALUES ('Data Export'); INSERT INTO pgagent.pga_jobclass (jclname) VALUES ('Data Summarisation'); INSERT INTO pgagent.pga_jobclass (jclname) VALUES ('Miscellaneous'); You don't have a UI for these job classes but they are used to populate the drop down list when creating a new job. If someone wants to insert/update/delete any of these job classes, they have to do this manually without a UI. Based on this, I would think we could add this feature without a UI change. I also thought about putting the job throttling into the job class by throttling jobs based on the job class they are in. It would take more changes to the SQL code but I think it would be doable and add more flexibility. Jon > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@pgadmin.org] > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 3:14 AM > To: Roberts, Jon > Cc: pgadmin-hackers; Lucas, Craig > Subject: Re: FW: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAgent job limit > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Roberts, Jon <Jon.Roberts@asurion.com> > wrote: > > > > I agree that a UI change would be ideal. > > Required, if this design is to be accepted in the standard code. Let > me check it over first though - I may have other concerns. > > -- > Dave Page > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The HOT PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: