Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199912300044.TAA16571@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery (sszabo@bigpanda.com) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > >Is this a good example of a required correlated subquery: > > > > SELECT f1.firstname, f1.lastname, f1.age > > FROM friends f1 > > WHERE age = ( > > SELECT MAX(age) > > FROM friends f2 > > WHERE f1.state = f2.state > > ) > > ORDER BY firstname, lastname > > > >It finds the oldest person in each state. HAVING can't do that, right? > > I'm assuming that this is for the book... If so, you might want to also > note that this query can return more people than there are states if > multiple people in the same state have the maximum age for that state. > > I'm not sure how deeply you are going into this, but getting only one > person per state looks like it might be fairly painful... You might be > able cheat if there was only one field besides age and state in the output > using group by and an aggregate. Yikes, that would be painful. Good point. Fortunately, the data has only one max person per state. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: