Re: [GENERAL] server hardware recommendations (the archives are dead)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] server hardware recommendations (the archives are dead) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199912152346.SAA08962@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] server hardware recommendations (the archives are dead) (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Adam Rossi wrote: > > > I know this question has been asked before. I have seen it in the archives. > > Unfortunately the archives are dead right now (any search will yield "no > > results") and I need to make some decisions. > > > > Can anyone give some general recommendations on hardware for a server > > running Linux (RH6 or 6.1) and PostgreSQL? I estimate that there will be > > about 2 GIG of data stored in the database initially, but this could grow as > > high as 5 GIG in the future. > > > > Since the db is not multithreaded, I assume that buying a dual processor > > board and two processors would not be helpful to performance. Like any > > actually, if you are going to have concurrent connections to the backend, > in some circumstances, PostgreSQL will handle multi-processors better then > others...process one runs on CPU0, process two runs on CPU1, etc... I have removed multi-threaded from our comparison web page. It confused too many people. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: