Re: psql & regression (was: Error in new psql)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql & regression (was: Error in new psql) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199912110340.WAA14726@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | psql & regression (was: Error in new psql) (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)) |
Ответы |
Re: psql & regression (was: Error in new psql)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> And who can guarantee that this kind of flaw cannot happen > anywhere else? There are many, very old regression tests. > Some of them go back to the roots, Postgres 4.2, and I'm not > sure anyone ever looked at the expected results lately, if > they are really what SHOULD be expected. The tenk data for > example is something where even I don't know where it was > coming from, and I already joined the Postgres community with > release 4.2 back in 1994. Thomas is the regression man, and has checked the output to see that it was expected in the past. I assume he will regenerate it soon. A good point is that he can use the old psql to see any changes/breakage in the backend code, but can _not_ use the new psql to check because the output is different. That is a good point, and I think the one Jan was making. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: