Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199912090254.VAA03027@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | More initdb follies (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Question 3: Is there a reason why the template1 database is vacuumed twice > in the process? Once before all the views are created (no analyze) and > once at the very end (with analyze). Yes, there is a reason, though I can't remember why. We need the analyze at the end so the system tables are completely optimized, but we need the earlier vacuum to set some table statistics that don't get set by the raw load used by initdb. You can try removing the first one to see if it works. Seems it works without the first initdb here. I will apply a patch to remove the first initdb. I think we needed it long ago for some reason. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: