Re: [HACKERS] cache question

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Can someone explain why there are two network_ops in the pg_opclass
> > table?
> 
> Looks like one is for type inet and the other for type cidr.  I'm
> still confused about the difference between the two types (hey,
> I ain't Paul Vixie) but I suspect we don't really need two entries
> in pg_opclass for them --- the types are binary-equivalent according
> to parse_coerce.h.  If we do need two entries, they should be given
> different names.

Done.  That's how I did it.

> > This stuff confusing.
> 
> It's 1:30AM EST ... way past time to be doing serious work, at least
> in this time zone ...

Yes, I wanted to get it working.  Seems like it works now.  Will commit
soon.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026