Re: [HACKERS] New regression driver

> It's me who added the function.
> I left it undocumented,sorry.
> Bruce,could you add an document on it ?

Done.  Will commit soon.

> 
> Bruce added a new index to pg_index.
> Index scan needs an information of pg_index.
> If we use the new index,we needs the information about the index
> in pg_index.
> Doesn't this cause a real cycle ?

Yes. I am using it for a pg_operator index too.

> 
> I added the function in order to hold one tuple which causes a real
> cycle. The tuple in pg_index should be scanned sequentially.
> 
> I don't think it's the best solution.
> Please change it if there's a better way.

I talked to Tom, and we think it is a good solution.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026